Grok 3 vs. ChatGPT - The Ultimate Battle

1
00:00:20,060 --> 00:00:24,940
Picture this Two AI Titans step
into the ring. 1 The reigning

2
00:00:24,940 --> 00:00:29,580
champion ChatGPT polished,
refined in the AI you've

3
00:00:29,580 --> 00:00:33,100
probably used for work writing
and creative brainstorming.

4
00:00:33,620 --> 00:00:37,180
The other, a bold challenger,
Brock. 3 unpredictable,

5
00:00:37,300 --> 00:00:40,740
unfiltered, and backed by none
other than Elon Musk.

6
00:00:41,060 --> 00:00:45,000
This isn't just another AI
comparison, this is a fight for

7
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,280
the future of artificial
intelligence.

8
00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:49,560
But here's where things get
interesting.

9
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,320
Cha Chi PT is reliable,
structured, and versatile.

10
00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:57,960
It's been the go to AI assistant
since 2022, but its last

11
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:01,920
knowledge update April 2024.
That means if you ask about

12
00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:03,680
what's trending right now, it's
guessing.

13
00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:06,560
Grok 3.
That's a different story.

14
00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:10,800
No knowledge cut offs.
It's life pulling real time data

15
00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:14,480
from the web and X, formerly
Twitter, processing breaking

16
00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:17,800
news, market shifts and whatever
wild thing must tweeted 10

17
00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:20,240
seconds ago.
This fight isn't just about

18
00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:23,720
who's smarter, it's about who's
more useful in the real world.

19
00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:29,200
And today we're testing both
side by side, no filters, no

20
00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:32,080
marketing spin.
Can Grock 3's real time edge

21
00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:33,960
out?
Wait chat, GP, TS, polished

22
00:01:33,960 --> 00:01:36,440
experience?
Does real time data actually

23
00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:38,960
make an AI more accurate or just
faster?

24
00:01:38,960 --> 00:01:41,600
Being wrong?
And their real question, which

25
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:44,760
one should you be using?
We're hosting this episode from

26
00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:48,880
a high tech AI research lab in
Los Angeles, where real world AI

27
00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,840
testing is happening right now.
The air hums with the low buzz

28
00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:56,680
of cooling fans as rows of
liquid cooled server racks glow

29
00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,400
and neon blue.
It's the kind of place where AI

30
00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:02,520
models aren't just tested,
they're pushed to their limits.

31
00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:06,160
Engineers and hoodies and noise
cancelling headphones move

32
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:08,840
between workstations, some
locked in on performance

33
00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:11,880
metrics, others adjusting
training parameters on the fly.

34
00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,480
There's a giant wall of monitors
in front of us, each one running

35
00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:19,320
a live feed of ChatGPT and Grok
3, processing the same prompts

36
00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:21,920
side by side.
The responses roll in like

37
00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:25,360
ticker tape on a Stock Exchange,
some smooth and structured,

38
00:02:25,520 --> 00:02:28,520
others raw, unpredictable,
firing off in real time.

39
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:30,480
The energy in the room is
electric.

40
00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:33,120
Every test, every prompt is a
battle.

41
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:37,320
One side of the lab favors
ChatGPT researchers, nodding in

42
00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:40,120
approval as it crafts well
structured, articulate

43
00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:42,200
responses.
The other side is all about

44
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:46,080
Grok, Three eyes lighting up as
it pulls in real time data,

45
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:48,920
responding with the latest
headlines, tweets, even a

46
00:02:48,920 --> 00:02:51,040
breaking stock alert mid
conversation.

47
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:53,840
This is why we're here.
Not in the soundproof studio,

48
00:02:53,920 --> 00:02:56,880
not in a corporate boardroom,
but on the ground, in a place

49
00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:59,880
where AI models are stress
tested like race cars on a

50
00:02:59,880 --> 00:03:02,080
track.
Because today we're not just

51
00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:05,560
talking about AI, we're watching
it fight for dominance in real

52
00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:07,680
time.
Over the next hour, we're going

53
00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:09,640
to push both models to their
limits.

54
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:14,480
Speed test who answers faster.
News test who gets today's

55
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:18,080
headlines right.
Creativity test who tells a

56
00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:21,240
better story.
Coding test who writes better

57
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,200
software.
And we won't just rely on test

58
00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:26,360
results.
We'll also break down a real

59
00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:29,520
user reactions, what people are
actually saying online about

60
00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,920
using Grok 3 and ChatGPT, and
business content creation and

61
00:03:33,920 --> 00:03:36,480
everyday life.
By the end, we'll declare a

62
00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:40,040
winner, or at the very least
help you decide which AI

63
00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:43,280
deserves your time.
Before we dive in, make sure to

64
00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:47,760
subscribe to Finance Frontier AI
on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or

65
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,480
wherever you listen.
Visit financefrontiera.com to

66
00:03:51,480 --> 00:03:56,040
access all episodes group by
Series AI, Frontier AI, Make

67
00:03:56,040 --> 00:03:59,440
Money, Finance Frontier, and
Mindset Frontier AI.

68
00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:03,560
And don't forget to follow us on
X for real time AI dates.

69
00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:06,360
Let's get started.
The gloves are off.

70
00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:10,760
It's time to break down what
these two AIS can actually do.

71
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,520
Because let's be real, AI
battles aren't one on hype,

72
00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:18,079
they're one on features,
performance, and real world

73
00:04:18,079 --> 00:04:21,680
usability.
And today we're putting Chat GT

74
00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,280
in Grok 3 head to head in a
feature face off.

75
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:28,120
If you're choosing an AI, here's
what actually matters.

76
00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:30,240
What can it do?
How fast is it?

77
00:04:30,560 --> 00:04:33,600
How accurate is it?
And let's be honest, how much is

78
00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,840
it going to cost you?
So let's break it down category

79
00:04:36,840 --> 00:04:39,680
by category.
First up, general knowledge and

80
00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,520
accuracy.
ChatGPT is trained on an

81
00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:46,160
absolutely massive data set,
fine-tuned over multiple

82
00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:49,760
generations and designed for
deep structure reasoning.

83
00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:53,880
It's precise, balanced, and
great at explaining complex

84
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:55,840
topics in a way that makes
sense.

85
00:04:56,280 --> 00:04:59,160
But here's the catch.
It's limited by its last major

86
00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:02,560
knowledge update in April 2024.
That means for anything that

87
00:05:02,560 --> 00:05:05,040
happened after that, it's
working off old data.

88
00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:08,080
That's where Grok 3 plays a
completely different game.

89
00:05:08,520 --> 00:05:11,880
There is no knowledge cut off.
It's pulling in real time data

90
00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:14,440
from X and the web.
Meaning if you ask about

91
00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:18,960
breaking news, market trends, or
the latest AI research, Grok can

92
00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:20,640
actually tell you what's
happening right now.

93
00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,240
But that comes with a trade off.
Real time data isn't always as

94
00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:26,960
reliable as something that's
been carefully trained and

95
00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:28,960
vetted.
It's fast, but it can also be

96
00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:32,240
fast at being wrong.
Now let's talk about raw power.

97
00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,920
ChatGPT is backed by open AIS,
cutting edge architecture

98
00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,480
designed for deep contextual
understanding and creativity.

99
00:05:40,840 --> 00:05:42,320
You ask it to write a
screenplay?

100
00:05:42,680 --> 00:05:44,800
Done.
Need a 10 page business

101
00:05:44,800 --> 00:05:46,480
strategy?
No problem.

102
00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:50,960
It's the AI you go to when you
need structured, long form,

103
00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:55,280
highly polished responses.
Grok 3, though, it's a different

104
00:05:55,280 --> 00:05:57,280
beast.
It has something called Think

105
00:05:57,280 --> 00:06:00,160
Mode, which lets it break
complex problems down into

106
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:02,760
steps, kind of like showing its
work in math class.

107
00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:06,640
And then there's Big Brain Mode,
designed to tackle high level

108
00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:10,320
reasoning and coding challenges.
If ChatGPT is the polished

109
00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:13,120
writer, Grok is the AI you call
when you want something

110
00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:15,360
dissected, analyzed, and
debated.

111
00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:18,600
And Speaking of coding, this is
where things get really

112
00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:22,120
interesting.
ChatGPT is a strong coding

113
00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:24,760
assistant.
It can write scripts, debug

114
00:06:24,760 --> 00:06:28,160
code, and even refactor messy
programs.

115
00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:31,080
But Grok 3?
It's been benchmarked as

116
00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:34,800
outperforming ChatGPT in raw
coding tests.

117
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:38,360
Developers have already noticed
it writing more efficient code

118
00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,480
and even suggests optimizations
in real time.

119
00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:44,120
So if you're a software
engineer, this could be a game

120
00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:46,520
changer.
But there is a major gap between

121
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:48,600
them.
Multimodal capabilities.

122
00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:54,160
ChatGPT Plus users $20.00 per
month get access to GPT 4 O

123
00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:59,000
which includes text generation,
image analysis and Doll E3 for

124
00:06:59,040 --> 00:07:02,480
AI generated art.
But if you want open AI's most

125
00:07:02,480 --> 00:07:06,520
advanced model, you'll need
ChatGPT Pro $200 per month,

126
00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:09,520
which unlocks the O1 model.
What's the difference?

127
00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:13,920
O 1 is far better at reasoning,
advanced math and visual

128
00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:16,560
analysis.
It can look at complex images,

129
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:19,760
breakdown diagrams, and even
generate video content with

130
00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:22,800
Sora.
Meanwhile, Grok 3 still no

131
00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:26,200
images, no video, no voice.
It's strictly text based.

132
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:29,920
And that brings us to the final
round, accessibility and cost.

133
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:34,680
ChatGPT has a free tier, meaning
anyone can use it anytime.

134
00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:38,800
Want the full power of GPT 4?
That'll cost you $20.00 a month.

135
00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:42,360
Brock 3.
It's locked behind XS Premium

136
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:46,160
Plus subscription Dollar 16 per
month, but bundled with all of

137
00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:48,360
Elon Musk's other premium
features.

138
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:51,600
If you're already paying for X
Premium Plus, great.

139
00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:55,080
If not, that price tag might
make you think twice.

140
00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:58,520
So here's the real question,
which one fits your life?

141
00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:01,720
CHA GBT is the all around
workhorse.

142
00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:05,840
Great for structured content,
multimodal AI and long form

143
00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:07,960
creative work.
Grock 3.

144
00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:12,200
It's fast, real time, and better
at technical tasks like coding.

145
00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:14,960
The choice depends on what you
actually need AI for.

146
00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,440
But theory is one thing, real
world performance is another.

147
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:21,960
Next, we're putting these models
through live tests.

148
00:08:22,320 --> 00:08:26,400
Can Grok 3 really outperform
ChatGPT in speed?

149
00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:30,600
Can it actually pull in real
time news better than a human?

150
00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:33,600
And which one gives better
creative responses?

151
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:37,360
We're about to find out.
Features are great on paper, but

152
00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:40,480
real world performance, that's
what actually matters.

153
00:08:40,840 --> 00:08:43,880
It's one thing to say an AI is
better at something, it's

154
00:08:43,880 --> 00:08:48,840
another to put it to the test.
So today we're running ChatGPT

155
00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:51,520
and Grok 3 through 4 brutal
challenges.

156
00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:56,040
Speed, accuracy, creativity,
coding.

157
00:08:56,480 --> 00:09:00,000
No fluff, just results.
First up, speed test.

158
00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:03,240
We ran the same set of 10
prompts through both models.

159
00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,440
News, updates, math problems,
general knowledge, creative

160
00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:08,000
writing.
And the results.

161
00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:12,960
Grok 3 is faster, no question.
In fact, on average, it

162
00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:15,880
responded 35% faster than
ChatGPT.

163
00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:19,440
But here's the catch.
Sometimes it sacrificed quality

164
00:09:19,440 --> 00:09:22,680
for speed.
While ChatGPT took longer, its

165
00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:25,680
responses were often more
structured and complete.

166
00:09:26,040 --> 00:09:28,680
So if you need instant answers,
Roc three wins.

167
00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:32,160
If you need something well
thought out, ChatGPT still has

168
00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:34,600
the edge.
But speed is just one part of

169
00:09:34,600 --> 00:09:36,800
the equation.
What about accuracy?

170
00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:40,800
Because let's be honest, an AI
that responds fast but gets

171
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,040
things wrong isn't exactly
useful.

172
00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:46,800
So for our accuracy test, we
threw 10 fact based questions at

173
00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:49,600
both AIS.
Things like who won the Super

174
00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:52,520
Bowl last weekend and what's the
current inflation rate in the

175
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,760
US.
This is where Grok 3's real time

176
00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:57,880
browsing should give it an
advantage.

177
00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:01,680
And in some cases, it did.
When we asked about breaking

178
00:10:01,680 --> 00:10:07,080
news, Grok 3 pulled in headlines
from X and the web ChatGPT.

179
00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:10,160
It was stuck guessing based on
old data.

180
00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:14,320
But here's where it got weird.
Grok 3 sometimes hallucinated

181
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:17,560
news that didn't exist.
We asked about a rumored Apple

182
00:10:17,560 --> 00:10:20,120
product launch.
It confidently told us Apple had

183
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:23,360
just announced a new MacBook.
Except Apple had.

184
00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:27,320
ChatGPT, on the other hand,
admitted it didn't know which,

185
00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:29,760
let's be real, is better than
making something up.

186
00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:32,840
So here's the trade off.
If you need up-to-the-minute

187
00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:35,400
information, Grok 3 is your best
bet.

188
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:37,360
But you need to Fact Check
everything.

189
00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:40,840
ChatGPT won't give you the
latest news, but it's more

190
00:10:40,840 --> 00:10:45,280
careful with accuracy.
So, news junkies Grok 3 deep

191
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:47,560
researchers.
ChatGPT.

192
00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:50,560
Now let's get to the fun part
Creativity.

193
00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:53,760
This is where ChatGPT usually
shines, right?

194
00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:56,360
So we gave both models the same
prompt.

195
00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:00,320
Write a short sci-fi story about
an AI that takes over the world,

196
00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:02,640
but in a good way.
And the results?

197
00:11:03,080 --> 00:11:06,240
Night and day.
ChatGPT wrote a fully structured

198
00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:09,280
short story beginning, middle,
and end.

199
00:11:09,680 --> 00:11:13,200
It had character development,
tension, and even a moral

200
00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:16,080
dilemma.
It was polished like something

201
00:11:16,080 --> 00:11:18,160
out of an actual sci-fi
anthology.

202
00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:23,360
Grok 3 Way different.
It gave us a wild, fast-paced

203
00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:27,000
narrative with punchy dialogue,
almost like a Twitter thread

204
00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:30,080
turned into a story.
So creativity depends on what

205
00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:32,200
kind of AI generated content you
want.

206
00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:36,160
If you want structured long
form, ready to publish material,

207
00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:39,560
ChatGPT is your best bet.
If you like fast,

208
00:11:39,560 --> 00:11:43,000
conversational, high energy
responses, Grok 3 might be more

209
00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:45,200
your style.
Finally, the coding test.

210
00:11:45,560 --> 00:11:47,600
We gave both models the same
challenge.

211
00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:51,800
Write a Python script that pulls
livestock data and calculates

212
00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:55,120
moving averages.
And this one wasn't even close.

213
00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,960
Grok 3 wrote the script in one
go with no major errors.

214
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:04,160
Chat GPTS version still good but
slightly more verbose and less

215
00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:07,000
optimized.
Grock's ability to refactor and

216
00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:09,920
improve its own code on the fly
gave it the win.

217
00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:13,920
So let's recap.
Grock three wins on speed and

218
00:12:13,920 --> 00:12:16,480
real time news retrieval, but
you need to Fact Check it.

219
00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:20,240
ChatGPT wins on structured
content and accuracy, but it's

220
00:12:20,240 --> 00:12:23,120
working off old data.
Grock 3 takes the crown for

221
00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:26,520
coding, while ChatGPT is still
the go to for creative writing

222
00:12:26,520 --> 00:12:29,920
and multimodal capabilities.
Bottom line, there's no

223
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:33,080
one-size-fits-all winter.
It all depends on what you need.

224
00:12:33,240 --> 00:12:35,800
And that brings us to the next
big question.

225
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:38,920
How does social media and the AI
community feel about this

226
00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:41,200
battle?
What are real users saying about

227
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:45,440
Grok 3 and ChatGPT?
We've gathered reactions from X,

228
00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:49,080
Reddit and AI forums, and trust
me, people have some strong

229
00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:51,120
opinions.
That's coming up next.

230
00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:54,000
AI models don't exist in a
vacuum.

231
00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:57,120
What really matters is how real
people use them.

232
00:12:57,560 --> 00:13:01,320
And when it comes to Grok 3
versus ChatGPT, the Internet has

233
00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:05,960
some very strong opinions.
Some users are all in on Grok's

234
00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:10,080
real time capabilities.
Others swear ChatGPT is still

235
00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:15,000
the king of AI.
We went deep X Reddit AI forums

236
00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:16,920
to see what people are actually
saying.

237
00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:20,720
Let's start with X users.
Since Croc 3 is built directly

238
00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:24,920
into X, it has a dedicated fan
base that swears by it. 1 user

239
00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:27,120
wrote.
Croc 3 is the first AI that

240
00:13:27,120 --> 00:13:29,880
actually feels alive.
It's like having a research

241
00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:33,360
assistant that doesn't sleep.
Another said Deep Search is a

242
00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:36,160
game changer.
I asked it about a legal case

243
00:13:36,200 --> 00:13:39,320
and it pulled up real time
discussions from legal experts.

244
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:44,160
But not everyone is convinced. 1
Common complaint inconsistency

245
00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:48,120
another user posted Grok 3 is
fast, but sometimes it's

246
00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:51,280
straight up makes things up.
I asked about a breaking news

247
00:13:51,280 --> 00:13:54,520
event and it gave me a
completely wrong update.

248
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:57,680
And this is a trend.
People love its speed, but some

249
00:13:57,680 --> 00:14:01,040
are worried about accuracy.
Over on Reddit, the discussions

250
00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:04,280
are just as heated.
The R slash artificial

251
00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:07,200
intelligence subreddit has
threads debating whether Grok

252
00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:11,480
3's real time advantage actually
matters, one highly upvoted

253
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:14,040
comment reads.
I don't need an AI to tell me

254
00:14:14,040 --> 00:14:16,720
the latest news.
I needed to break things down in

255
00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:20,440
a way that actually makes sense.
And this is where ChatGPT

256
00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:23,760
shines.
ChatGPT has built a reputation

257
00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:27,720
for being structured, balanced
and well reasoned. 1 redditor

258
00:14:27,720 --> 00:14:30,680
put it best.
ChatGPT doesn't always have the

259
00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:34,440
latest info, but I trust it more
when I use grok.

260
00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:36,640
I feel like I have to double
check everything.

261
00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:40,520
Another comment.
Chat GT is my go to for long

262
00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:43,120
form content.
Grok Three is fun, but I

263
00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:44,960
wouldn't trust it for anything
serious.

264
00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:49,280
But it's not all bad for Grok.
A growing number of developers

265
00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:52,200
and analysts are moving toward
it because of its coding

266
00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:54,560
abilities.
A user in our programming

267
00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,400
posted.
Grok 3 actually optimized my

268
00:14:57,400 --> 00:14:59,440
Python script in a way I didn't
expect.

269
00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:02,480
It's way better for technical
queries than ChatGPT.

270
00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:04,440
Then there's the question of
tone.

271
00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:08,120
ChatGPT is known for being
neutral and professional.

272
00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:10,880
Grok 3.
It's got attitude.

273
00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:15,640
Some users love the snarky
conversational replies, others

274
00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:21,160
not so much. 1X user complained
I asked Rock for a summary of a

275
00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:23,320
book and it roasted the author
instead.

276
00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,600
Another defended it.
I like that Grok doesn't feel

277
00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:29,920
like a corporate PR bot.
So where does this leave us?

278
00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:34,040
If you want an AI that's fast,
real time, and unfiltered, Grok

279
00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:36,680
3 is for you.
If you want something polished,

280
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:40,000
structured, and reliable, stick
with ChatGPT.

281
00:15:40,400 --> 00:15:43,560
But if you're like most users,
you'll probably end up using

282
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:46,080
both.
But that leads us to the biggest

283
00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:49,040
question of all.
What's the best use case for

284
00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:52,120
each AI?
Should you use Grac for work?

285
00:15:52,360 --> 00:15:56,280
ChatGPT for research?
Or is there a way to combine

286
00:15:56,280 --> 00:15:59,160
them for the best experience
that's coming up next.

287
00:15:59,360 --> 00:16:02,760
So now that we've seen the
strengths, weaknesses, and what

288
00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:05,200
real users think, let's get
practical.

289
00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:07,960
Which AI should you actually
use?

290
00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:11,800
Because let's be honest, most of
us aren't just running AI

291
00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:15,600
benchmarks for fun.
We need tools that make life

292
00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:18,160
easier.
O let's break this down into

293
00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:20,800
real world use cases.
If you're in business,

294
00:16:20,800 --> 00:16:24,880
marketing, or content creation,
Chat GT is still the clear

295
00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:27,280
winner.
It's structured, it understands

296
00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:30,280
tone, and it generates polished,
professional content.

297
00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:33,640
If you need an e-mail sequence,
a LinkedIn post, or a press

298
00:16:33,640 --> 00:16:37,680
release, ChatGPT delivers clean,
ready to use material without

299
00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:39,840
requiring much editing.
Grok 3.

300
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:45,680
It's fun, fast and sharp, but it
doesn't have the same long form

301
00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:48,640
writing flow.
But what if you're in finance,

302
00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:52,240
trading, or research?
That's where Grok 3 shines.

303
00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:55,480
It's not just about pulling in
real time stock data.

304
00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:59,480
It has Deep Search, a powerful
AI driven web and X analysis

305
00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:02,680
tool that finds and ranks the
most relevant live information.

306
00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:06,200
That means Grog doesn't just
scrape headlines, it evaluates

307
00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:10,280
sources, cross checks claims,
and gives context, something no

308
00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:13,119
other AI does at this speed.
What about coding?

309
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:16,240
If you're a developer, you know
how important real time

310
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:20,400
debugging and optimization are.
ChatGPT is great for explaining

311
00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:24,359
concepts, writing documentation,
and breaking down complex

312
00:17:24,359 --> 00:17:26,240
problems.
But Grok 3?

313
00:17:26,680 --> 00:17:29,840
It's been outperforming ChatGPT
in pure coding ability,

314
00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:32,840
especially in efficiency and
live code optimization.

315
00:17:33,000 --> 00:17:35,720
If you're writing scripts,
debugging, or looking for raw

316
00:17:35,720 --> 00:17:38,360
performance, Grok is probably
the better choice.

317
00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:40,960
But let's talk about AI for
everyday life.

318
00:17:41,400 --> 00:17:43,960
If you need an assistant that
helps you organize your day,

319
00:17:44,040 --> 00:17:47,520
answer complex questions, and
provide detailed explanations,

320
00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:51,000
ChatGPT is your go to.
It's more structured, more

321
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:54,000
polished, and easier to use in
day-to-day workflows.

322
00:17:54,440 --> 00:17:57,560
Grok 3, on the other hand, is
best for quick, dynamic

323
00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:00,240
interactions.
Think real time recommendations,

324
00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:02,920
fast fact checking, and casual
brainstorming.

325
00:18:03,120 --> 00:18:05,000
And then there's the price
factor.

326
00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:08,760
ChatGPT offers a free tier,
meaning you can always use a

327
00:18:08,760 --> 00:18:11,280
version of it without paying
Brock 3.

328
00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:13,560
It's locked behind X Premium.
Plus.

329
00:18:13,920 --> 00:18:16,320
That means unless you're already
paying for Elon Musk's

330
00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:18,600
subscription plan, you won't
even have access.

331
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:20,480
That's a deal breaker for some
users.

332
00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:24,280
So here's the final breakdown.
If you need real time news

333
00:18:24,360 --> 00:18:27,760
coding, refinance data, Brock 3
is the better choice.

334
00:18:28,120 --> 00:18:31,520
If you need structured content,
writing, creativity, or a

335
00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:34,520
reliable assistant, ChatGPT is
still king.

336
00:18:34,920 --> 00:18:37,680
But here's the reality.
Subscribing to both can cost

337
00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:41,360
anywhere from $50.00 to over
$200 a month, depending on the

338
00:18:41,360 --> 00:18:43,720
plan.
For most people, picking one AI

339
00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:45,800
that fits their workflow is the
smarter choice.

340
00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:50,000
If you're a trader, journalist,
or developer, Grog 3's live data

341
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:51,640
and deep search give it the
edge.

342
00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:54,720
If you need a research
assistant, a writing tool, or

343
00:18:54,720 --> 00:18:58,640
multimodal AI, ChatGPT is the
better long term investment.

344
00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:01,680
But that leads to the biggest
question of all which AI is

345
00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:05,240
actually worth paying for?
Should you subscribe to ChatGPT

346
00:19:05,240 --> 00:19:08,760
Plus or X Premium Plus?
And what's the best strategy if

347
00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:11,440
you don't want to spend a dime?
That's coming up next.

348
00:19:11,640 --> 00:19:14,880
Let's be real, nobody wants to
pay for an AI subscription

349
00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:18,920
unless it's actually worth it.
With ChatGPT Plus at $20.00 a

350
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:23,560
month and Rock 3 locked behind X
Premium Plus at $16.00 a month,

351
00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:26,640
the question is, which one gives
you the best value?

352
00:19:26,840 --> 00:19:29,080
And if you're not looking to
spend a dime, what's the

353
00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:30,960
smartest way to use them for
free?

354
00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:35,760
Let's start with ChatGPT Plus.
For $20.00 a month you get GPT 4

355
00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:39,320
O access, faster response times,
and early access to some

356
00:19:39,320 --> 00:19:40,880
features like advanced voice
mode.

357
00:19:41,360 --> 00:19:45,160
If you're a writer, marketer, or
anyone relying on AI for daily

358
00:19:45,160 --> 00:19:49,120
work, this upgrade makes sense.
But if you need open a is most

359
00:19:49,120 --> 00:19:53,760
powerful model, there's also
ChatGPT Pro at $200 a month that

360
00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:57,120
unlocks the O1 model, sort of
video generation and advanced

361
00:19:57,120 --> 00:19:59,840
multimodal reasoning that's not
included in Plus.

362
00:20:00,320 --> 00:20:03,440
If you're a casual user, the
free version of Chat GT still

363
00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:07,000
gives you solid results, just
without GT for O's full power.

364
00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:09,800
Now Grok 3.
Here's where it gets tricky.

365
00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:14,920
As of February 2025, Grok 3 is
now free for all X users, but

366
00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:18,040
with limits.
Full access still requires X

367
00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:21,800
Premium Plus at $40 a month, or
the new Super Grok plan at

368
00:20:21,800 --> 00:20:24,280
$30.00 a month.
If you're already subscribed to

369
00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:27,040
X Premium Plus, Grok 3 is a
solid bonus.

370
00:20:27,040 --> 00:20:30,360
But if you only want the AI,
you're paying for a subscription

371
00:20:30,360 --> 00:20:34,080
that includes extras like ad
revenue sharing, verification,

372
00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:37,600
and longer posts, features that
may or may not matter to you.

373
00:20:37,880 --> 00:20:40,840
So which one gives you more for
your money?

374
00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:45,160
If you need an AI assistant for
work, writing, or structured

375
00:20:45,160 --> 00:20:48,480
tasks, ChatGPT Plus is the
better deal.

376
00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:52,280
You're paying specifically for
better AI performance, and it's

377
00:20:52,280 --> 00:20:54,640
designed to be a true
productivity tool.

378
00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:57,520
Grok 3.
It's worth it if you're already

379
00:20:57,520 --> 00:21:00,960
deep into the ACT ecosystem.
If you use Twitter daily, follow

380
00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:04,240
trends, and want an AI that's
plugged into real time data.

381
00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:07,640
But let's talk about how to get
the most out of these AIS for

382
00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:12,360
free, because not everyone wants
to pay for AI and honestly you

383
00:21:12,360 --> 00:21:14,640
can get a lot without spending a
cent.

384
00:21:15,120 --> 00:21:19,000
The best free strategy?
Use chat GPS free tier for

385
00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:21,440
structured content and detailed
responses.

386
00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:25,360
Then when you need real time
info, jump over to Croc 3 if you

387
00:21:25,360 --> 00:21:27,920
have access to a free trial or
shared account.

388
00:21:28,080 --> 00:21:31,880
Another trick, Use alternative
AI tools to fill in the gaps.

389
00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:35,480
If you need free real time
browsing, try Perplexity AI.

390
00:21:35,800 --> 00:21:39,000
If you need image generation,
use Bing's free Dolly tool.

391
00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:42,800
The key is knowing which AI is
best for each task, because no

392
00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:44,600
single model does it all
perfectly.

393
00:21:44,880 --> 00:21:49,080
So here's the bottom line.
If you need AI daily for work,

394
00:21:49,280 --> 00:21:52,560
ChatGPT Plus is worth the $20.00
a month.

395
00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,080
If you're already subscribed to
X Premium Plus, Grok 3 is a

396
00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:59,640
great bonus, but if you're
trying to stay free, the best

397
00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:04,480
strategy is mixing chat GPTS
free version with other AI tools

398
00:22:04,480 --> 00:22:07,840
for different tasks.
But that brings us to the final

399
00:22:07,840 --> 00:22:10,800
decision.
We've tested both models, broken

400
00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:14,680
down their strengths, seeing
what real users think, and even

401
00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:17,600
compared cost.
Now it's time for the final

402
00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:20,160
verdict.
Which AI is actually the best

403
00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:22,280
choice?
That's coming up next.

404
00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:26,160
We've tested them, we've broken
down the features, performance,

405
00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:28,600
real world use cases, and even
the cost.

406
00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:31,000
Now it's time for the final
verdict.

407
00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:34,000
Which AI actually deserves your
time and money?

408
00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:36,520
Let's start with the strengths.
If you need real time

409
00:22:36,520 --> 00:22:40,600
information, up-to-the-minute
news or AI assisted coding, Grok

410
00:22:40,600 --> 00:22:43,920
3 is the better pick.
It's fast, connected to the web,

411
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:47,200
and constantly learning.
If you're a trader, journalist,

412
00:22:47,200 --> 00:22:50,560
or developer, Grok 3's ability
to pull real time data is a

413
00:22:50,560 --> 00:22:53,000
serious advantage.
But if you need structured,

414
00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:57,240
detailed, and well reasoned
responses, ChatGPT still comes

415
00:22:57,240 --> 00:22:59,040
out ahead.
It's better at long form

416
00:22:59,040 --> 00:23:02,080
writing, business applications,
and creative storytelling.

417
00:23:02,520 --> 00:23:05,120
Plus it has multimodal
capabilities.

418
00:23:05,120 --> 00:23:08,880
It can analyze images, generate
visuals with Dolly, and even

419
00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:11,720
assist with coding explanations
in a way that's easier to

420
00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:14,320
understand.
So which one is better?

421
00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:17,560
It depends on what you need and
what you're willing to pay for.

422
00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:20,720
If you want the AI that's going
to give you the most reliable,

423
00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:23,880
structured answers, creative
writing, and multimodal

424
00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:28,480
capabilities, ChatGPT Plus at
$20.00 per month is a great

425
00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:30,120
value.
If you want cutting edge

426
00:23:30,120 --> 00:23:34,240
reasoning, video generation with
Sora and most advanced AI Open

427
00:23:34,240 --> 00:23:38,840
AI has to offer, you'll need
ChatGPT Pro at $200 per month.

428
00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:42,440
If you need real time news, deep
web analysis, and technical

429
00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:44,560
coding assistance, Grok 3 is
your AI.

430
00:23:44,760 --> 00:23:48,120
And while there's a free
version, full access requires X

431
00:23:48,120 --> 00:23:52,680
Premium Plus at $40 per month or
Super Grok at $30.00 per month.

432
00:23:53,200 --> 00:23:55,760
Here's the reality.
Subscribing to both can cost

433
00:23:55,760 --> 00:23:59,680
well over $200 a month.
So for most people, picking one

434
00:23:59,720 --> 00:24:02,800
AI that fits their workflow and
budget is the smart move.

435
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:06,080
But here's the thing, most
people don't have to pick just

436
00:24:06,080 --> 00:24:08,720
one.
If you have access to both, the

437
00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:10,640
best approach is using them
together.

438
00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:15,160
ChatGPT for deep thinking,
structured answers, creative

439
00:24:15,160 --> 00:24:17,680
work.
Grok 3 for instant research,

440
00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:20,320
real time news, and quick fire
analysis.

441
00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:24,880
And if you're asking which one
should I pay for, ChatGPT Plus

442
00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:27,240
is the better stand alone
subscription because you're

443
00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,360
paying directly for AI
performance.

444
00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:32,800
If you're already an X Premium
Plus subscriber, Grok 3 is a

445
00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:36,720
fantastic AI bonus, but it's not
worth subscribing just for Grok

446
00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:38,600
alone.
So what do you think?

447
00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:42,000
Which AI wins for you?
We want to hear from you.

448
00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:45,920
Tweet us and tell us whether
your team ChatGPT or team Grok

449
00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:47,800
3.
If you're ready to dive deeper,

450
00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:49,200
here's what you can do right
now.

451
00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:53,520
Subscribe to AI Frontier AI on
Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or

452
00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:57,040
wherever you listen.
Visit financefrontierai.com to

453
00:24:57,040 --> 00:25:01,040
access all episodes grouped by
series AI Frontier AI, Make

454
00:25:01,040 --> 00:25:03,840
money, Finance Frontier and
mindset Frontier AI.

455
00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:07,200
And if you found today's episode
valuable, please take a moment

456
00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:10,440
to leave us a five star review.
It helps us grow and reach more

457
00:25:10,440 --> 00:25:11,480
listeners.
Like thank you.

458
00:25:12,040 --> 00:25:14,240
Let's stay ahead of the AI
revolution together.

459
00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:17,600
A quick reminder, the views and
information shared in today's

460
00:25:17,600 --> 00:25:20,520
episode reflect our analysis at
the time of recording.

461
00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:24,320
AI evolves rapidly, and new
developments may shift the

462
00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:27,200
facts.
Always do your own research and

463
00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:29,400
consult professionals for
tailored advice.

464
00:25:29,520 --> 00:25:33,760
Today's music, including our
intro and outro track Night

465
00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:37,760
Runner by Audionautics, is
licensed under the YouTube Audio

466
00:25:37,760 --> 00:25:40,880
Library license.
Additional tracks are licensed

467
00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:44,400
under Creative Commons, and full
details can be found in the

468
00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:48,480
episode description.
Copyright Copyright 2025 Finance

469
00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:53,360
Frontier AI All rights reserved.
Reproduction, distribution, or

470
00:25:53,360 --> 00:25:55,960
transmission of this episode's
content without written

471
00:25:55,960 --> 00:25:57,880
permission is strictly
prohibited.

472
00:25:58,360 --> 00:26:00,440
Thank you for listening and
we'll see you next time.